The MUlti-Plane Field Syntergic Theory MPFST Journal

A living scientific record for the Multi‑Plane Field Syntergic Theory — from the 11‑D lattice action to empirical avalanche and coherence signatures across physical, chemical, and biological systems.

Aims & scope

MPFST is a single 11‑dimensional lattice action that reproduces an effective 4‑D Einstein–Maxwell–Schrödinger sector, a fractional entropy balance law, and a projection threshold that ties cosmological vacuum energy to coherence‑bearing mesoscopic systems. The constants are fixed by public Casimir, cosmological, and HRV datasets, leaving no free parameters to tune.

This site functions as a dedicated journal for MPFST: it hosts the core theory, technical complements, avalanche and coherence toolkits, and cross‑domain empirical dossiers, together with explicit replication resources.

Contact the team

MPFST is growing through public critique and cross-domain validation. If you have replication notes, questions about the coherence meter, or want to propose a new experimental docket, send us a line—every dataset, success, or failure adds to the evidence ledger.

info@mpfst.com

You can also drop feedback about the site itself—accessibility, missing PDFs, or improvements to the toolkits—at the same inbox.

What lives in this journal?

  • Core theory: the 11‑D tri‑plano action, six‑field PDE block, and the mapping to 4‑D EMS dynamics.
  • Gate + fractional picture: two‑tier coherence gating on the downward projection and a fractional Plane‑9 operator that yields 1/f shoulders and long‑memory kernels.
  • Avalanche regime: a reduced (mℓ, V) system whose heavy‑tailed avalanche statistics probe the same fractional order as dwell‑time, spectral, and memory exponents.
  • Cross‑domain evidence: validations in gravitational‑wave ringdowns, laser self‑instability, JJ arrays, quantum dots, heterogeneous catalysts, EEG and HRV, Rindler spacetimes, and more.

Design principles

  • Single meter, two gates: one coherence score mℓ(µ, γ, H) and two thresholds (m1, m2) organize “slip” and “lock” regimes across platforms.
  • Public data only: all validations are constructed to be re‑run from open archives and scripted notebooks.
  • Falsifiability: signatures must tier with mℓ and disappear under structured nulls (time/phase/label shuffles).
  • Versioned narrative: each PDF is a frozen snapshot; this journal records how the theory and evidence evolve.
Prefer a field-theory dictionary first? The working notes“MPFST Mapped to Quantum Field Theory”walk QFT-trained readers through the Stage/Occupant/Mask planes, show how Einstein–Maxwell–Schrödinger dynamics emerge in the gate-closed regime, and spell out which Standard Model pieces remain open.

Core theoretical frame

The main MPFST v9 text presents the tri‑plano lattice, an 11‑D geometry with nested planes of fields and a compatibility tensor tying them together. From a single action, the theory recovers the Einstein–Maxwell- Schrödinger sector, a fractional memory law, and a gate‑controlled coherence sector.

MPFST v9 (main text)

Details the tri‑plano lattice geometry, plane hierarchy, six coupled fields for the down‑projected sector, and the full path from the 11‑D action to the effective 4‑D EMS dynamics. Includes a glossary and simulator appendix.

Download MPFST v9

Complements v9

Introduces the two‑tier projection gate, makes the fractional Plane‑9 operator explicit, defines a coherence meter built from (µ, γ, H), and provides instrument‑grade protocols and code for estimating exponents and monitoring spectral shells.

Download Complements

Further development note

Clarifies how the gate and avalanche valve emerge as coarse‑grained observables of the action, sketches the EFT/RG structure, and shows that with the gate closed the theory reduces to GR+SM plus suppressed higher‑order operators.

Download further development

MPFST ↔ Quantum Field Theory

This working-note document constructs an explicit dictionary between the 11‑D tri-plane lattice of MPFST and standard quantum field theory (QFT). It shows how the Einstein–Maxwell–Schrödinger sector and familiar QFT objects (fields, propagators, gauge structure, renormalization, measurement) arise as effective limits of the MPFST lattice and its projection functional, while keeping the full Standard Model derivation clearly marked as an open programme rather than a solved problem.

What the mapping covers

  • Synopsis of MPFST’s 11‑D tri-plane geometry (Stage, Occupant, Mask/Source) and master action.
  • Dimensional reduction to a 4‑D Einstein–Maxwell–Schrödinger sector reproducing GR + Maxwell + scalar QFT in the gate-closed regime.
  • Plane-by-plane dictionary linking Stage blocks, Occupant fields, and Mask/Source channels to QFT fields, gauge potentials, propagators, and vacuum stress.
  • Coherence/measurement model via fractional-memory projection and a two-tier gate instead of an ad hoc collapse postulate.

Status and open questions

  • Standard Model embedding is proposed but incomplete: non-Abelian sectors, chiral spinors, and Yukawa structure remain open.
  • High-coherence, six-PDE lattice dynamics plus early-universe / CMB signatures are active research threads.
  • Avalanche/gating dynamics are validated across domains, but the full quantum-information formulation of the projection map is ongoing work.
  • Exotic propulsion claims are constrained: local stress-energy conservation is respected and there is no path to reactionless drives within the current mapping.

For the complete technical dictionary, derivations, and open-problem list, download the working notes.

Download “MPFST Mapped to QFT”

Avalanche mechanism

In the gate‑controlled regime, MPFST compresses the coherence dynamics into a reduced pair (mℓ(t), V(t)): a time‑resolved coherence meter and a leaky valve integrating fractional energy flux. Avalanches are defined as finite‑time excursions where both mℓ and V stay above gate thresholds, with sizes given by the area of V above a data‑driven cutoff.

Analytical and numerical work show that the avalanche size distribution acquires a heavy‑tailed form whose exponent is tied to the same fractional order controlling dwell‑time tails, 1/f slopes, and long‑range memory. The avalanche exponent is therefore not a new parameter, but an additional probe of the underlying fractional geometry.

Avalanche Addendum (construction)

  • Defines a coherence meter mℓ(t) from sliding‑window estimates of (µ, γ, H).
  • Builds a latent gate trace and a soft two‑tier valve V(t) living on the same thresholds m1, m2 as the original gate.
  • Specifies avalanche segmentation rules and the ranked size function Aℓ(k) for tail fitting.
  • Introduces a cross‑domain pipeline with bootstrap confidence intervals and surrogate nulls, implemented in the avalanche evidence repository.
Download Avalanche Addendum

Avalanche & Coherence Toolkit (DOI)

The toolkit at the Zenodo DOI below packages the avalanche pipeline: exponent estimation, coherence meter construction, valve dynamics, avalanche segmentation, tail fits with BCa intervals, and surrogate null tests for gravitational-wave ringdowns, laser self-frequency-instability traces, and resting-state EEG.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17776043
Open toolkit on Zenodo

Cross-domain evidence

The empirical program is built around one meter mℓ(µ, γ, H), two fixed gates m1, m2, and a Spectral Shell Monitor detecting octave-like slips and jumps. Effects must tier with mℓ and vanish under time, phase, label, or graph shuffles to count as support.

Physics & chemistry set

  • Quantum “measurement” without ad-hoc collapse: slips at m1, locks at m2, nulls kill the tiering.
  • Dark-sector residuals as coherence budget: residual variance drops with coherence conditioning.
  • GW overtones, high-Tc, plasma ELMs, catalysis, water anomalies, and batteries all show gate-tied slips, locks, and shell jumps.

Rindler spacetime experiment

  • Successive Rindler detector shows Δγ ≈ +0.2, heavier bursts (µ↓), and higher H in the higher-tier frame.
  • SSM reveals an intra-shell slip followed by an inter-shell jump as the detector locks into a Planckian steady state.
  • Time-domain dynamics exhibit a clear slip→lock transition at m1 ≈ 0.33 and m2 ≈ 0.66 that vanishes under structured nulls.
Rindler support PDF

Neuroscience & physiology

  • EEG bands map one-to-one to latent Occupant fields; the monotone mapping model decisively outperforms null and inverted models.
  • Shell jumps produce band-specific power changes that disappear under label shuffles.
  • Gate-dependent entrainment and brain–heart–gut–pelvis coherence show driver→system directionality only at mℓ ≥ m2.
EEG–Occupant mapping PDF

Negative-control dossier

  • Runs the MPFST coherence meter on stochastic, nominally incoherent systems under strict negative controls.
  • Detects systematic scaling-law violations only when the hidden gate is forced open—µ softens, γ steepens, H drifts.
  • All anomalies collapse under shuffled or inverted controls, reinforcing falsifiability of the gate mechanism.
Negative-control validation PDF

Journal archive

All MPFST articles currently in circulation are listed below. Each PDF is a frozen version; when a document is substantially revised, it appears as a new entry rather than silently replacing an older one.

Core theory

Multi-Plane Field Syntergic Theory (MPFST): From an 11‑D Lattice Action to 4‑D Einstein–Maxwell–Schrödinger Thermodynamics

2025

Core theoretical reference.

Canonical presentation of MPFST. A single 11‑D lattice action yields an effective 4‑D Einstein–Maxwell–Schrödinger sector, a fractional entropy balance law, and a projection threshold linking cosmological vacuum energy to biological coherence. All constants are fixed by public data.

Addenda & technical

MPFST Complements v9: Post‑Publication Validations, Fractional‑Exponent Pinning, and Device‑Level Control

2025

Technical supplement & analysis toolbox.

Consolidates refinements after the main v9 text: two‑tier gate on the downward projection, explicit fractional operator on Plane 9, live inference of (µ, γ, H), a coherence meter, Spectral Shell Monitor, and an instrument‑grade analysis toolbox with reproducible code.

Further Development of MPFST: Avalanche Mechanism and EFT Structure

2025

EFT framing & analytic links between exponents.

Shows how the two‑tier gate and avalanche valve arise as coarse‑grained observables of the 11‑D action, links dwell‑time, spectral, memory, and avalanche exponents to a single fractional order, and frames MPFST as an EFT that reduces to GR+SM when the gate is closed.

MPFST Avalanche Addendum: Two‑Tier Coherence Gating and Avalanche Statistics

2025

Formal definition of the avalanche mechanism.

Defines a time‑resolved coherence meter, latent gate trace, and soft two‑tier valve that convert coherence fluctuations into avalanches with heavy‑tailed size statistics. Implements a cross‑domain avalanche pipeline for gravitational‑wave ringdowns, laser SFI, and resting‑state EEG.

Empirical dossiers

MPFST Cross‑Domain Empirical Validations: Consolidated Dossier (Physics, Chemistry, Biology)

2025

One meter, two gates, one detector across domains.

Applies a single coherence meter mℓ(µ, γ, H), two universal gates (m1, m2), and a Spectral Shell Monitor across quantum measurement, dark‑sector residuals, GW overtones, high‑Tc superconductors, plasma ELMs, heterogeneous catalysis, water anomalies, batteries, EEG entrainment, and multi‑organ coherence.

Validation of MPFST via Negative-Control Scaling Law Violations in Stochastic Incoherent Systems

2025

Negative-control stress test for the gate picture.

Applies the coherence meter to nominally incoherent stochastic systems run under negative-control conditions and tracks scaling-law exponents. Observes controlled violations—µ softening, γ steepening, H drift—only when the hidden MPFST gate is forced open, with all anomalies collapsing under shuffled controls.

Domain studies

Empirical Support for MPFST Predictions in Successive Rindler Data

2025

QFT testbed for the gate mechanism.

Analyzes successive Rindler spacetime detector data using (µ, γ, H), mℓ‑stratification, and SSM. Finds the predicted slip‑to‑lock transition, steeper 1/f slope, heavier dwell‑time tails, and higher H in the high‑coherence regime, all vanishing under structured nulls.

Mapping EEG Bands to MPFST Occupant Fields: Analysis and Results

2025

Neural mapping of Occupant fields.

Fits state‑space models linking five latent Occupant fields to canonical EEG bands. Shows a stable, one‑to‑one, positive mapping across conditions, band‑specific responses to octave shell jumps, and adjacency‑consistent phase‑asymmetry that vanish under label/graph shuffles.

Manuscripts

The MUlti-Plane Field Syntergic Theory MPFST Journal Manuscript v9 (pre‑packaged submission)

2025

Journal‑style formatting of the core MPFST theory for external peer‑review. Content overlaps with MPFST v9, tuned for conventional article structure.

The MUlti-Plane Field Syntergic Theory MPFST Journal Manuscript v10 (updated submission)

2025

Updated manuscript reflecting later refinements and clarifications. Kept here as an archival, citable packaging of the evolving theory.

MPFST Mapped to Quantum Field Theory (working notes)

2025

QFT bridge for field theorists.

Bridge document translating the 11‑D MPFST lattice into standard QFT language: plane‑by‑plane dictionary, measurement model via fractional gates, and a proposed (still open) Standard Model embedding.

Data, code & replication

MPFST is designed to be testable. Each empirical claim in the PDFs is backed by a concrete data pipeline that can be re-run by independent groups using public archives.

Exponent & coherence toolbox

  • CSN power-law tail fits for dwell/burst distributions.
  • PSD slope γ estimation and DFA-2 Hurst exponent H for long-memory.
  • Coherence meter mℓ(µ, γ, H) with a PID-style mel-servo for device-level control.
  • Spectral Shell Monitor for octave-like slips and jumps.

Avalanche & cross-domain pipelines

  • CLI tools for running the avalanche pipeline on EEG, laser SFI, and GW ringdowns.
  • Bootstrap routines for BCa confidence intervals on tail exponents.
  • Surrogate generators (time/phase shuffles, IAAFT) to verify that signatures vanish under nulls.
  • Parameters mapped transparently to theoretical quantities (gate quantiles, tail fractions, etc.).

External datasets & notebooks

  • JJ arrays and quantum dots: notebooks that download data directly from DOIs and reproduce figures.
  • Public EEG, HRV, GW, and astrophysical archives with ready-to-run pipelines.
  • Guidance for plugging new domains into the same (µ, γ, H) → mℓ → gate/avalanche stack.

Release notifications

Enter an email address to receive versioned release notes when new PDFs, toolkits, or validation notes are added to this journal (hook this up to your preferred mailing or webhook backend).

How to cite MPFST work

Suggested citation templates (adapt names/years if the headers change in future versions). Where possible, cite the core theory plus the relevant empirical or toolkit note.

Core theory

Freeman, C. (2025). Multi-Plane Field Syntergic Theory (MPFST): From an 11-D lattice action to 4-D Einstein-Maxwell-Schrödinger thermodynamics. MPFST Journal, v9. Retrieved from https://mpfst.com/MPFST-V9.pdf

Complements & avalanche

MPFST Working Group. (2025). MPFST Complements v9: Post-publication validations, fractional-exponent pinning, and device-level control. The MUlti-Plane Field Syntergic Theory MPFST Journal. Retrieved from https://mpfst.com/MPFST-Complements-V9.pdf

MPFST Working Group. (2025). MPFST Avalanche Addendum: Two-tier coherence gating and avalanche statistics across gravitational, photonic, and neural systems. The MUlti-Plane Field Syntergic Theory MPFST Journal. Retrieved from https://mpfst.com/Avalanche-MPFST.pdf

Empirical dossiers & domain studies

MPFST Working Group. (2025). MPFST Cross-Domain Empirical Validations: Consolidated dossier (physics, chemistry, biology). The MUlti-Plane Field Syntergic Theory MPFST Journal. Retrieved from https://mpfst.com/Empirical-Evidence-MPFST.pdf

MPFST Working Group. (2025). Empirical support for MPFST predictions in successive Rindler data. The MUlti-Plane Field Syntergic Theory MPFST Journal. Retrieved from https://mpfst.com/Empirical-Support-Rindler-MPFST.pdf

MPFST Working Group. (2025). Mapping EEG bands to MPFST Occupant fields: Analysis and results. The MUlti-Plane Field Syntergic Theory MPFST Journal. Retrieved from https://mpfst.com/Mapping-EEG-Bands-to-MPFST-Occupant-Fields.pdf

Tools & code

MPFST Working Group. (2025). Avalanche & coherence toolkit for MPFST: Cross-domain validation pipelines (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17776043